In a judgment delivered on 17th September, 2024, the Economic and Financial Crimes Court ordered the forfeiture of a ZMW 8 million farm in Sinda District, owned by Tasila Lungu, a Member of Parliament for Chawama constituency in the Lusaka District and daughter of former President Edgar Lungu. The Court concluded that the property was tainted by unexplained wealth as investigations revealed a significant discrepancy between Tasila Lungu’s income and the value of the farm.
This case, which has garnered national attention, is a striking example of the government’s resolve to pursue asset recovery and ensure accountability in property ownership. The Court’s judgment was based on evidence showing that the property was unlawfully acquired, with Tasila Lungu unable to justify the purchase and development of the farm based on her legitimate income.
The Court found that from 2015 to 2021, Tasila Lungu’s documented income amounted to only ZMW 154, 200, an amount far short of what would be required to afford the ZMW 8million farm. An investigation revealed a glaring gap between her income and the value of the farm, with over ZMW 7.9 million remaining unexplained.
While Tasila Lungu claimed that her father, former President Edgar Lungu, had assisted her in purchasing the farm, the Court rejected this explanation due to a lack of credible documentation. The judgment is clear: without a transparent money trail proving that the funds used were legitimate, the property could reasonably be assumed to have been acquired through illegal means.
This case extends beyond the personal implications for Tasila Lungu. It speaks to the broader issues of transparency, accountability, and the application of Zambia’s forfeiture laws. The State’s commitment to investigating and addressing the illegal accumulation of wealth, regardless of the individuals involved, is a testament to the country’s dedication to strengthening governance and legal systems.
The judgment also mirrors the case of Chiyeso Lungu where the court underscored that claims of family assistance must be backed by evidence. The Court’s stance is firm: claims of family assistance must be backed by clear, verifiable financial records. Otherwise, the only logical conclusion is that such properties are linked to economic crimes.
Tasila Lungu’s farm forfeiture is a major victory in Zambia’s fight against corruption and economic crime. It sends a powerful message to those who may seek to use political influence or wealth for personal gain at the expense of the nation. The government’s efforts to recover assets and ensure they are rightfully returned to the State reflect the importance of accountability, no matter one’s status or connections.
This case also highlights the effectiveness of Zambia’s legal frameworks in dealing with property rights and asset forfeiture. By upholding these laws, the State reinforces the principle that no individual is above the law, and that wealth must be acquired through legitimate means.
The forfeiture of Tasila Lungu’s farm is not just a legal victory—it is a critical step in restoring public trust in Zambia’s justice system. It reinforces the importance of transparency in the acquisition of property and the need for credible documentation to support claims of wealth.
As Zambia continues to strengthen its fight against economic crimes, this case sets a powerful precedent. It serves as a reminder that integrity in governance is non-negotiable, and that the State will continue to hold individuals accountable for the unlawful acquisition of assets. The road to justice and accountability remains clear, and the country’s resolve to secure it stronger than ever.
